This is a very short summary of what I view as the 5 most important facts in understanding alternative models for LDS truth claims. To the best of my knowledge, every point made in this document is accepted as factual by both LDS and non-LDS scholars (please correct me if I am mistaken and I will alter the document).1

1. The 3rd facsimile is incorrectly translated

Joseph Smith mis-translated the characters above the heads of the figures in the third facsimile.

Joseph refers to Egyptian characters in specific locations on facsimile 3 and he gives a translation. This translation does not match the translation made by BYU scholars.

According to LDS scholars Hauglid and Jensen, Joseph Smith and his scribes “were working off of the papyri that we actually have in the Church today.” However, the Book of Abraham lds.org essay generally admits “the characters on the fragments do not match the translation given in the book of Abraham.”

More:

Resources on the Book of Abraham

2. The Book of Mormon is packed with 19th century ideas

In a recent interview, the well-known Mormon historian Richard Bushman stated:

… there is phrasing everywhere [in the Book of Mormon], long phrases, that if you google them you will find them in 19th century writings. The theology of the Book of Mormon is very much 19th century theology, and it reads like a 19th century understanding of the Hebrew Bible …

By any measure the Book of Mormon contains an immense number of ideas, phrases, and theology common to the early nineteenth century. Here are two examples of many:

More:

3. Spiritual confirmations are common to members of many religions

Members interpret spiritual experiences as a confirmation that their faith is true. But these confirmations are common to members of many faiths (e.g., Judaism, Catholicism, Seventh Day Adventist, Scientology, Islam, and Divine Truth), many of which hold central tenets that flatly contradict core LDS doctrines.

More:

Resources on faith, spiritual witnesses, and epistemology

4. LDS leaders taught that the Priesthood/Temple ban was divine

A 1949 First Presidency statement declared2:

The attitude of the Church with reference to Negroes remains as it has always stood. It is not a matter of the declaration of a policy but of direct commandment from the Lord…

And a 1969 First Presidency letter stated:

Our living prophet, President David O. McKay, has said, “The seeming discrimination by the Church toward the Negro is not something which originated with man; but goes back into the beginning with God…Revelation assures us that this plan antedates man’s mortal existence, extending back to man’s preexistent state.”

The Lowry Nelson letters and the Stewart Udall letters demonstrate the unwavering confidence Church leaders of that time had in the divinity of the Black Priesthood/Temple ban and the doctrines and teachings supporting it as well as the manner in which dissent may be treated in the Church.

More:

5. Joseph Smith’s polygamy is ethically problematic

Nearly all LDS scholars acknowledge that Joseph Smith was married to at least 33 wives, 11 of whom were already legally married to other men. The manner in which Joseph Smith practiced and spoke about polygamy was deceptive3 and at least some of his proposals would likely be viewed as involving undue influence according to modern ethical standards.4

In a recent interview, the most faithful LDS apologists on polygamy recounted the feelings of reviewers of their recent book on the topic: “At the end of the book [the book reviewer] didn’t get a warm fuzzy feeling and that’s not really something we think we can deliver with this topic.”

More:

More Complete Analyses

See Problem Summaries: resources discussing LDS-truth claims

  1. Brian Hales very cursorily responded to this document; Here is my response to his cursory thoughts. I have altered the presentation of a few points based on this and other exchanges and appreciate his feedback. 

  2. For documentation on the promulgation of the 1949 First Presidency letter, see PhD dissertation by Douglas Marty Trank, “A Rhetorical Analysis of the Rhetoric Emerging from the Mormon - Black Controversy” (August 1973), p.110-111:

    The First Presidency of the LDS Church set forth the position of the Church in a statement in August of 1949. The same statement was re-issued in 1951 after the accession of David O. McKay as President. After the surge of interest in civil rights in the 1960’s, the Church issued a modified and expanded statement on December 15, 1969. This statement is presently the only official statement of the position of the Church with regard to the Negro. [21]

    [21] Interview with Henry Smith, spokesman for the LDS Church Offices, Salt Lake City, July 13, 1972. [22] The statement issued in 1949 and again in 1951 was issued prior to any serious criticism of the Negro policy of the Church and is assumed to have been directed primarily for instruction within the Church. 

  3. The word “deceptive” was chosen because it is the most precise word to describe Joseph Smith’s polygamy denials

  4. See The Belmont Report on Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research for a discussion of what typically constitutes “undue influence.”